Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Even if music doesn't necessarily 'improve' in quality like technology does, we definitely have a better technical understanding of how to use different sounds than people did centuries ago.

Conclusion: It is reasonable to claim that musical knowledge increases over the course of time.

Reasoning: Modern composers understand how to effectively use sounds and intervals, like the third, that were previously avoided or considered dissonant.

Analysis: The conclusion is found in the middle of the first sentence, signaled by the phrase 'there are ways in which it makes sense to talk about musical knowledge growing.' The author starts by dismissing one view (the developmental view) to clarify the specific claim they *are* supporting. The subsequent sentences about the interval of the third serve as evidence for this growth in knowledge. When identifying the conclusion, always ask: 'What is the one point the author is trying to prove with all these examples?'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

Correct Answer
E
It captures the thesis that our understanding of music can improve over time, which is exactly what the author claims after the concession and then supports with examples.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep