Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Just because two things happen together doesn't mean one caused the other; they might both be caused by a third, hidden factor like how someone was raised.

Conclusion: One cannot definitively claim that studying music as a child causes a person to become better at mathematics.

Reasoning: While there is a correlation between music study and math skills, it is just as plausible that both are caused by a third factor, such as a family environment that encourages all-around excellence.

Analysis: This stimulus identifies a classic correlation-versus-causation error. The author rejects a causal claim by proposing an alternative 'common cause' that explains both observed phenomena. To find a parallel, look for an argument that takes two things that happen at the same time and argues that we can't say one caused the other because a third variable might be responsible for both. It’s the 'it’s not A causing B, it’s C causing both' template.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

17.

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following arguments is most parallel to that in the argument above?

Correct Answer
A
Choice A matches the structure: observes X (inattention) with Y (poor school performance), cautions against concluding X → Y, and offers Z (hearing problems) that could cause both X and Y. That is the same correlation → don’t infer causation → propose common cause pattern.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep