Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The author says we shouldn't listen to famous people who tell us to be green, because those famous people have huge carbon footprints themselves.

Conclusion: Criticism of middle-class environmental impact should be dismissed.

Reasoning: The celebrities who criticize middle-class lifestyles are hypocrites because their own lifestyles are even more environmentally damaging.

Analysis: This argument commits a classic 'ad hominem' fallacy, specifically the 'tu quoque' or appeal to hypocrisy. The author attacks the character and behavior of the critics rather than addressing the actual substance of the environmental criticism. Even if a movie star is a hypocrite, their claim that certain lifestyles damage the environment could still be factually true. Look for an answer choice that highlights this focus on the person's character instead of the validity of their argument.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

The reasoning in the letter to the editor is vulnerable to criticism in that it

Correct Answer
A
Correct. It dismisses the criticism by attacking the personal characteristics/behavior of the people giving it (celebrities), instead of addressing the criticism’s content.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep