StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A psychologist claims that because kids act out right after playing violent games, the games are teaching them that being aggressive is okay.

Conclusion: Violent video games cause young children to believe that aggressive behavior is acceptable.

Reasoning: Observations show that children act more aggressively immediately after playing video games that contain violent content.

Analysis: The psychologist is jumping from a short-term observation (immediate aggression) to a long-term internal state (believing aggression is acceptable). To strengthen this, we would want evidence that this behavior isn't just a temporary 'adrenaline rush' or that the children's attitudes actually change. Since this is an 'EXCEPT' question, look for the one answer choice that either does nothing for the argument or potentially suggests the aggression is caused by something else entirely, like the frustration of losing the game.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

Each of the following, if true, strengthens the child psychologist's argument EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
B
B undercuts rather than supports: if many young children who never played violent games already believe aggression is acceptable, that suggests the belief can form independently of violent-game exposure, weakening the proposed causal explanation.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep