Passage Summary: We shouldn't be upset about people finding out the truth, even if that truth is awkward or might cause some trouble in the world.

Reasoning: The philosopher posits that the discovery of truth should not be condemned even if the truth is uncomfortable or potentially harmful to society.

Analysis: This is a 'Principle Application' question, so we need a scenario where someone discovers a 'bad' or 'harmful' truth and we are told not to judge the discovery. The key is to find an example that matches both conditions: the truth is undesirable or harmful, yet the act of revealing it is defended. It’s a classic 'truth at all costs' stance that ignores the negative consequences of the information.