Principle JustifyDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A bookstore owner argues that you should only shop at local independent shops because chain stores are killing off the variety that only independent stores provide.

Conclusion: Consumers ought to purchase books exclusively from independent bookstores rather than from large bookstore chains.

Reasoning: Independent stores offer a broader selection of titles, and because chains threaten the survival of these independent stores, they effectively diminish the total variety of books available to the public.

Analysis: The argument makes a leap from a factual observation about market variety to a moral prescription about where people should spend their money. To justify this, we need a principle that connects the preservation of variety to consumer obligation. Look for an answer that suggests consumers have a duty to avoid supporting businesses that reduce the diversity of products available in a marketplace.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the bookstore owner's argumentation?

Correct Answer
B
This principle directly bridges the gap: if consumers should buy only from bookstores whose existence does not reduce variety, and chains tend to reduce variety while independents provide wider variety, then the conclusion (buy only from independents, not chains) is justified.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep