Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since thieves steal what rich collectors want to buy, museums should put extra guards on their most expensive pieces.

Conclusion: Museums should concentrate their security efforts on their most expensive and valuable items.

Reasoning: Art theft is increasing, and because thieves steal what their wealthy buyers want, they target the items those buyers find most desirable.

Analysis: There is a significant 'Gap' here between what is 'valuable' and what 'customers are most interested in buying.' The argument assumes that these two categories perfectly overlap. To find the necessary assumption, ask yourself: what if wealthy collectors actually prefer rare, less expensive artifacts over the most famous, high-priced masterpieces? If that were true, the museum's plan to guard only the 'most valuable' pieces would leave the actual targets unprotected.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B is necessary because it links demand to value: if less valuable works were in high demand among wealthy collectors, thieves would target those too, and the directive to focus more security on the most valuable pieces would not be justified. Negation test: if less valuable pieces are very much in demand, the conclusion that museums ought to focus more security on the most valuable pieces is undermined.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep