Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because bacteria get sucked into the interior of wooden boards rather than staying on top, the author claims you can skip the soap and water and just wipe off the crumbs.

Conclusion: Wooden cutting boards do not require washing to prevent food contamination; simply wiping away debris is enough.

Reasoning: Unlike plastic boards where bacteria linger on the surface, bacteria on wooden boards sink into the material immediately, leaving the surface free of germs.

Analysis: The gap in this argument is quite large: it assumes that 'out of sight' means 'out of mind' for bacteria. The author concludes that the board is safe just because the surface appears free of contamination, but this relies on the assumption that bacteria trapped inside the wood cannot somehow resurface or contaminate food later. To find the necessary assumption, ask yourself what *must* be true for this cleaning shortcut to work. If the bacteria could just pop back up or seep into the next steak you cut, the argument falls apart.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Correct Answer
D
D is necessary. If bacteria that penetrate into wood do not reemerge on the surface after use, then a surface that becomes clean when bacteria go inside will remain noncontaminating, making wiping debris sufficient. Negation test: if such bacteria can reemerge, then the surface could later be contaminated, so merely wiping would not reliably prevent contamination—destroying the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep