Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Sydonie thinks school rules will always upset some parents because everyone has different parenting styles. Stephanie argues that's not true because parents actually say they want schools to have good discipline.

Conclusion: Sydonie is wrong to claim that school disciplinary structures will inevitably cause resentment among parents.

Reasoning: Research indicates that parents consistently rank 'good discipline' as one of the top things they want schools to provide for their children.

Analysis: Stephanie's argument suffers from a classic mismatch of terms. Sydonie is talking about the *specific rules* (the 'disciplinary structure') and how they might clash with individual beliefs, while Stephanie is talking about the *general concept* of 'good discipline.' Just because parents want 'discipline' in the abstract doesn't mean they will agree with the specific version the school implements. Look for an answer that points out Stephanie is ignoring the possibility that parents can want discipline generally while still resenting the specific rules that contradict their own parenting styles.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

Stephanie's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

Correct Answer
C
C identifies the core gap: Stephanie does not counter that parents have diverse ideas about what counts as ‘good discipline.’ So showing that parents want discipline doesn’t refute that any particular structure will contradict some parents and create resentment.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep