ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Tall dams are more likely to break, and most dams in the world are tall. However, every recent dam failure has happened to a short dam.

Reasoning: Higher dams are theoretically more vulnerable to collapse and represent the majority of arch dams, yet only shorter dams have actually collapsed recently.

Analysis: We are faced with a classic discrepancy between theoretical risk and actual outcomes. If height increases risk and tall dams are the majority, we would expect them to fail more often, yet the opposite is happening. To resolve this, we need a factor that makes tall dams safer in practice or short dams more vulnerable despite their lower height. Look for an answer that introduces a variable like stricter engineering standards for tall dams or the fact that tall dams are generally newer and better maintained.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?

Correct Answer
C
If larger structures receive more careful attention in design and construction, then taller arch dams, though more exposed, are made robust enough to avoid collapse. That reconciles the general “height increases exposure” with the observation that only shorter arch dams have collapsed.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep