ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Farmers used to use more fertilizer to grow more food, but now they are using less fertilizer even though they still want to grow more food.

Reasoning: Historically, increased fertilizer use led to doubled productivity, and while farmers still want to increase productivity, fertilizer use has actually decreased since 1985.

Analysis: The paradox here lies in the reversal of a long-standing trend: if fertilizer was the engine of productivity for decades, why would its use drop while the desire for productivity remains high? We need a piece of information that explains how farmers can pursue higher yields while simultaneously cutting back on fertilizer. Perhaps there is a more efficient way to apply it, or maybe a different technology has taken its place. Look for an answer that provides a reason why the historical correlation between fertilizer volume and productivity no longer holds true.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

Correct Answer
D
If fertilizer additions stop significantly improving production after several years, farmers can still aim to increase productivity while sensibly cutting fertilizer use, resolving why usage fell despite the continued goal of higher yields.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep