Passage Summary: A town official argues that even though skateboarding in the park is risky, we shouldn't ban it because the kids will just move to the streets, which are even worse.

Conclusion: The town should refrain from passing a law that bans skateboarding in River Park.

Reasoning: The primary goal of such laws is child safety, and banning park skateboarding would force children into the streets, which is a significantly more dangerous environment.

Analysis: This argument relies on a 'lesser of two evils' logic to justify inaction. To strengthen this as a Principle Justify question, we need a rule that connects the goal (safety) with the specific decision to allow a dangerous activity. Look for a principle stating that a restrictive policy should not be adopted if it results in a situation that is more dangerous than the one it seeks to prevent. The councillor is essentially prioritizing net safety outcomes over the elimination of a single specific risk.