Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hard
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: The author claims air bags don't actually make cars safer because cars with air bags get into more accidents than cars without them.
Conclusion: Cars equipped with air bags are not safer than cars that do not have them.
Reasoning: Although air bags reduce injury risk during a crash, statistics indicate that cars without air bags are involved in fewer accidents overall.
Analysis: The argument suffers from a failure to define 'safety' comprehensively. It assumes that safety is only about the frequency of accidents, completely ignoring the severity of the outcome when an accident does occur. A car that gets into one minor fender-bender where the driver walks away (thanks to an air bag) is arguably 'safer' than a car that gets into one high-speed collision where the driver is severely injured. Look for an answer that points out this oversight—the argument ignores the fact that air bags fulfill their safety function specifically during the accidents that do happen.
Conclusion: Cars equipped with air bags are not safer than cars that do not have them.
Reasoning: Although air bags reduce injury risk during a crash, statistics indicate that cars without air bags are involved in fewer accidents overall.
Analysis: The argument suffers from a failure to define 'safety' comprehensively. It assumes that safety is only about the frequency of accidents, completely ignoring the severity of the outcome when an accident does occur. A car that gets into one minor fender-bender where the driver walks away (thanks to an air bag) is arguably 'safer' than a car that gets into one high-speed collision where the driver is severely injured. Look for an answer that points out this oversight—the argument ignores the fact that air bags fulfill their safety function specifically during the accidents that do happen.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage25.The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
Correct Answer
D
Correct. The argument’s conclusion that cars with airbags are no safer only follows if the likelihood of having an accident is assumed to count at least as much as (or more than) the seriousness of injuries when comparing safety. That weighting is not supported by the premises.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal