Principle ApplicationDiff: Medium
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: The city currently pays for all sidewalk injuries, but the author argues they should only pay if they knew about a specific problem and ignored it.
Conclusion: Governments should only be held liable for injuries on public property if they were aware of the hazard and failed to fix it.
Reasoning: It is physically impossible for the city to monitor and maintain such a vast network of sidewalks to eliminate every single potential danger.
Analysis: This is a Principle Application question, so we need to find a scenario where the current law (strict liability) and the proposed principle (knowledge-based liability) lead to different outcomes. Specifically, we want an instance where the city is currently liable but would be 'innocent' under the new rule. This means the injury must have been caused by a defect that the city did not know about. If the city was unaware of the danger, the new principle would protect them from a lawsuit that they would lose under the current system.
Conclusion: Governments should only be held liable for injuries on public property if they were aware of the hazard and failed to fix it.
Reasoning: It is physically impossible for the city to monitor and maintain such a vast network of sidewalks to eliminate every single potential danger.
Analysis: This is a Principle Application question, so we need to find a scenario where the current law (strict liability) and the proposed principle (knowledge-based liability) lead to different outcomes. Specifically, we want an instance where the city is currently liable but would be 'innocent' under the new rule. This means the injury must have been caused by a defect that the city did not know about. If the city was unaware of the danger, the new principle would protect them from a lawsuit that they would lose under the current system.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage7.Which one of the following describes an injury for which the city of Grimchester is now liable, but should not be according to the principle cited above?
Correct Answer
C
The city had only just learned of the hole minutes before the injury, so there’s no negligent failure despite the defect. Currently liable (defective sidewalk) but not liable under the principle (no negligence with prior knowledge).
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal