Passage Summary: Rhonda will only go to a movie if Paul goes to a concert. Paul will only go if Ted goes. Since Ted isn't going, the whole plan falls apart for everyone.

Conclusion: Rhonda will not be attending the movie tomorrow afternoon.

Reasoning: Rhonda's attendance depends on Paul going to a concert, and Paul's attendance depends on Ted going, but Ted has refused to go.

Analysis: This argument utilizes a 'chain of necessity' structure, often represented in formal logic as A → B and B → C. The argument then establishes that the final requirement (C) is false, which triggers a series of 'if-then' reversals (modus tollens) to prove that the first event (A) cannot happen. To find the parallel, look for a choice that sets up a similar conditional chain and then denies the final condition to disprove the initial one. The logic is perfectly valid, so we are simply matching the structural blueprint.