Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: New research proves pronunciation shifts happen suddenly, which ruins the old 'classical' theory. Because the classical theory is wrong, the author claims all theories about sound change must be wrong.

Conclusion: The entire field of sound-change theory must be abandoned.

Reasoning: Recent evidence shows sound changes happen quickly rather than gradually, which invalidates the classical account of sound change.

Analysis: The argument suffers from a significant 'part-to-whole' gap. The author discovers a flaw in one specific version of a theory (the classical account) and concludes that the entire category of sound-change theory is therefore doomed. To bridge this gap and guarantee the conclusion, we need an assumption that links the survival of the classical account to the survival of the field as a whole. Look for an answer that suggests the classical account is the only possible foundation for sound-change theory.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

16.

Which one of the following, if assumed, does most to justify the argument's conclusion?

Correct Answer
D
If all theories of sound change rely heavily on the classical theory, then discarding the classical theory entails discarding the whole body of sound-change theory. This supplies the missing link that makes the conclusion follow.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep