Passage Summary: Sasha wants to ban handwriting experts because they lie about their accuracy. Gregory agrees they are currently a problem but argues that if we just regulate them with a license, they will be useful and honest.

Conclusion: Handwriting analysis should be kept as a courtroom tool once a licensing board is established to regulate it.

Reasoning: The current issues with handwriting analysis stem from a lack of professional standards rather than an inherent flaw in the practice itself.

Analysis: Gregory uses a 'concede and reframe' strategy. He acknowledges Sasha's premise that analysts are currently unreliable but disputes the conclusion that the practice should be banned entirely. He identifies a specific cause for the unreliability—lack of regulation—and suggests that fixing this cause preserves the utility of the evidence. Focus on how Gregory distinguishes between a temporary flaw in implementation and an inherent flaw in the method.