Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Someone claims lefties aren't actually more dangerous than righties because, in total, righties have more accidents at home.

Conclusion: The idea that left-handed people are more accident-prone than right-handed people is false.

Reasoning: In absolute numbers, right-handed people are involved in more household accidents than left-handed people are.

Analysis: This argument makes a classic numbers vs. percentages error by ignoring the relative sizes of the two groups. Since there are vastly more right-handed people in the world, they could cause more accidents in total even if left-handed people are individually much more likely to have an accident. To prove lefties aren't more prone to accidents, you'd need to compare the rate of accidents per person, not the raw total. It's like saying sharks are safer than dogs because more people are bitten by dogs every year.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

The reasoning is flawed because the argument

Correct Answer
B
The argument ignores the relative frequencies of left- and right-handed people. Without adjusting for how many people are in each group, the fact that right-handed people cause more total accidents does not show that they are more or less prone to cause accidents.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep