ParadoxDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists found a way to make decaf coffee that should taste great, but when it first came out, people complained that it tasted bad.

Reasoning: A technology was developed to remove caffeine without affecting flavor, yet the initial consumer feedback indicated that the resulting coffee tasted poor.

Analysis: The paradox lies in the conflict between the technical success of the process and the negative subjective experience of the consumers. To resolve this, we need a bridge that explains the bad taste without disproving the effectiveness of the caffeine extraction. Perhaps the coffee beans used in the first batches were of low quality, or perhaps the consumers' expectations of 'decaf' influenced their perception of the flavor. Look for an answer that introduces an outside variable—like bean quality or marketing—that accounts for the bad taste while leaving the extraction process's integrity intact.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

4.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the statements above?

Correct Answer
E
If producers initially used low-quality beans for decaf, the poor taste is explained by bean quality rather than the decaffeination process itself. That reconciles a taste-preserving process with early bad taste reports.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep