Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Mu mesons in a lab die off quickly, but the ones flying through space at nearly the speed of light seem to last much longer; otherwise, we wouldn't see so many of them hitting Earth.

Reasoning: Mu mesons in a lab decay quickly, but those traveling at near-light speed from space reach Earth in numbers that would be impossible if they decayed at the same rate.

Analysis: The premises set up a mathematical discrepancy. If the decay rate were constant regardless of speed, the numbers wouldn't add up. Therefore, the conclusion must bridge this gap by suggesting that high speed actually slows down the decay process. This is a classic physics-based inference question where you must synthesize the data points to reach the only logical outcome. Look for an answer that explains the survival of the cosmic mesons through their velocity.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?

Correct Answer
D
D says the fast-moving mu mesons decay more slowly than those almost at rest. That directly explains why far more of them survive to be detected than the equal-decay-rate prediction allows.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep