Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A psychologist says little kids don't realize animals have feelings until they're older, so we shouldn't let them have pets until they hit that age.

Conclusion: Most children should not be given pets until they reach at least six years of age.

Reasoning: Children under six generally lack an understanding of animals' feelings and needs, viewing them selfishly instead.

Analysis: There is a significant gap between 'not understanding an animal's feelings' and 'should not have a pet.' The argument assumes that understanding an animal's needs is a strict requirement for pet ownership. To make this conclusion follow logically, we need a premise that says if a child cannot understand an animal's feelings, they should not have one. Look for an answer that explicitly links the psychological capacity for empathy to the appropriateness of having a pet.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

16.

The child psychologist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
E
E supplies the needed bridge: only children who understand animals as independent creatures with their own feelings and needs should have pets. Given that most under six lack this understanding, it follows that most children should wait until at least six to have pets.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep