Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Good acting shouldn't break the illusion of the play. If it does, the audience struggles to feel for the characters, and a good play shouldn't do anything that makes the audience enjoy it less.

Conclusion: Effective acting performances avoid reminding the audience that they are watching a performance.

Reasoning: Reminding the audience of the performance hinders their ability to empathize with characters, and effective performances do not reduce the audience's appreciation of the play.

Analysis: The argument has a logical gap between 'difficulty empathizing' and 'detracting from appreciation.' The author assumes that if an audience finds it harder to empathize with a character, they will necessarily appreciate the play less. To make this conclusion follow logically, we need a bridge that turns 'harder to empathize' into 'detracts from appreciation.' Look for an answer that guarantees that any reduction in empathy constitutes a reduction in the overall quality or appreciation of the performance.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

The argument's conclusion follows logically from the premises if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
E
E supplies the needed bridge: if making empathy harder detracts from appreciation, then calling attention (which makes empathy harder) detracts; because effective performances do not detract, they cannot call attention to themselves. The conclusion follows.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep