Flawed ReasoningDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: An editorialist claims that laws limiting cigarette ads are working because fewer people smoke now than ten years ago, which is when those laws started.
Conclusion: The implementation of tobacco advertising restrictions has played a major role in reducing the number of adult smokers.
Reasoning: Adult smoking rates are at a twenty-year low, and the most significant drop occurred over the last decade, which is exactly when major advertising restrictions were put into place.
Analysis: The editorialist falls into the classic trap of assuming that because two things happened at the same time, one must have caused the other. While it is tempting to credit the ad ban for the decline in smoking, the argument ignores other potential factors like tax hikes, health education, or social shifts. You should look for an answer choice that points out this 'correlation does not equal causation' error. It is a bit like a sports fan wearing 'lucky socks' and assuming the socks are why the team won—ignoring the actual players on the field.
Conclusion: The implementation of tobacco advertising restrictions has played a major role in reducing the number of adult smokers.
Reasoning: Adult smoking rates are at a twenty-year low, and the most significant drop occurred over the last decade, which is exactly when major advertising restrictions were put into place.
Analysis: The editorialist falls into the classic trap of assuming that because two things happened at the same time, one must have caused the other. While it is tempting to credit the ad ban for the decline in smoking, the argument ignores other potential factors like tax hikes, health education, or social shifts. You should look for an answer choice that points out this 'correlation does not equal causation' error. It is a bit like a sports fan wearing 'lucky socks' and assuming the socks are why the team won—ignoring the actual players on the field.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage9.The reasoning in the editorialist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
Correct Answer
E
E is correct because it identifies the key causal gap: the editorialist fails to consider other factors that could explain the decline, so the mere timing match does not establish that ad restrictions caused the decrease.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal