Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Newton's rules say gravity only cares about how heavy things are and how far apart they are. Because of this, the author concludes you don't need to know what a planet is made of to figure out its path through space.

Conclusion: Calculating the orbits of the Sun and planets does not require a theory regarding their internal structure or composition.

Reasoning: Newtonian theory states that gravitational force depends only on the mass of bodies and the distance between them, regardless of what they are made of.

Analysis: The argument assumes that gravity is the only factor needed to calculate an orbit. While the premise establishes that gravity is independent of a body's composition, the conclusion assumes that nothing *else* involved in calculating an orbit depends on that composition. To make this logically airtight, we need an assumption that confirms orbits are determined exclusively by the gravitational forces described. If something else—like magnetic fields or internal density distribution—affected the orbit, the conclusion would fail.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The conclusion of the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
B
B supplies the missing bridge: if, per Newtonian theory, calculating planetary orbits requires considering only gravitational forces, and those forces depend only on mass and distance (not composition), then internal structure or composition is irrelevant to orbit calculation. That makes the conclusion follow.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep