Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A grocery store claims that a sample of their most popular items costs 10 percent more at a competitor's store, even when those items aren't on sale.

Reasoning: No reasoning (Fact Set).

Analysis: Since this is a 'Most Strongly Supported' question, we must treat the advertisement's claims as facts and find the most reasonable inference. The data is very specific: it concerns 'most often' purchased items and 'everyday prices.' Look for an answer that stays within these bounds, likely confirming that for a specific set of popular goods, BigFoods was cheaper than Grocerytown at the time of the study.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

The statements in the advertisement, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?

Correct Answer
C
If the varied sample of frequently purchased items cost 10 percent more at Grocerytown in total, then at least some items in that sample must have been more expensive at Grocerytown—i.e., cheaper at BigFoods. That directly matches choice C.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep