Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A plant disease causes spots on tomatoes, but a copper spray fixes it. Therefore, the speaker concludes the disease must have been caused by a lack of copper in the first place.

Conclusion: Late blight is caused by a deficiency of copper in a tomato plant's mineral intake.

Reasoning: Applying a copper solution to plants affected by late blight is an effective way to treat the disease.

Analysis: This argument commits a classic 'cause versus cure' fallacy. It assumes that because a substance cures a condition, the absence of that substance must have caused the condition. To parallel this flaw, look for an answer choice that identifies a successful treatment and then incorrectly concludes that the problem was a deficiency of that specific treatment.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

7.

The flawed nature of the argument can be most effectively demonstrated by noting that, by parallel reasoning, we could argue that

Correct Answer
D
It matches the structure: from “paracetamol treats headaches” to “headaches are caused by a lack of paracetamol.” That is the same flawed leap from treatment to cause via a supposed deficiency.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep