Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A shop owner thinks crime isn't scaring away customers because the people currently in the shop say they aren't scared.

Conclusion: Crime is not negatively impacting the store's business by deterring potential shoppers.

Reasoning: The owner spoke to current customers, and those customers reported that they are not worried about crime in the area.

Analysis: This is a textbook case of 'survivorship bias.' The owner is only surveying the people who actually made it into the store—the ones who clearly weren't deterred by crime. He is completely ignoring the potential customers who stayed home specifically because they were afraid. It's like asking people at a steakhouse if they are vegetarians and concluding that no one in town avoids meat. Look for an answer that points out the owner's failure to sample the very group of people relevant to the conclusion: those not currently shopping.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

The reasoning in the store owner's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
D
D correctly identifies the flaw: the argument draws its conclusion from a biased sample of people currently shopping, excluding those who might have been deterred by crime.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep