Role in ArgumentDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Lindsey thinks writing poetry makes people sad because most poets she knows are sad and because the work itself is very heavy and draining.

Conclusion: It is reasonable to believe that the act of writing poetry causes many poets to become melancholy.

Reasoning: The poets the author has met are usually melancholy, and the intense nature of writing poetry is known to be potentially depressing.

Analysis: The claim in question provides a general reason or a causal mechanism that explains why the observed correlation (sad poets) might actually be a result of the activity (writing poetry). In terms of structure, this claim acts as a premise supporting the main conclusion by making the proposed cause-and-effect relationship more plausible. It moves the argument beyond a simple observation of 'sad people' to a theory of 'why they are sad.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in Lindsey's argument by the claim that an activity as profound and engrossing as writing poetry can be depressing?

Correct Answer
E
The claim about profound, engrossing activities being depressing is a standalone premise that directly supports the argument’s main causal conclusion about poetry making poets melancholy.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep