Passage Summary: Some schools give kids money for every book they read. The author thinks this is a bad move because it might ruin the natural joy of reading by making it feel like a job.

Conclusion: Programs that pay primary school students to read should be regarded with skepticism.

Reasoning: While these programs might increase the volume of reading, they risk causing children to view reading as a tedious task rather than an inherently enjoyable activity.

Analysis: The argument relies on the assumption that a program's potential to undermine intrinsic motivation is a sufficient reason to distrust it. To support this, we need a principle that prioritizes the psychological approach to an activity over the sheer quantity of the activity performed. Look for an answer that suggests any program that risks replacing internal satisfaction with external rewards is fundamentally flawed. It's a classic 'quality of motivation over quantity of output' debate.