PrincipleDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: When a toddler bites you, they aren't trying to be mean. They probably just want a toy and see you as an obstacle in their way.

Conclusion: Toddlers do not have malicious intent when they bite others.

Reasoning: Biting is often a functional response to a toddler's frustration when they feel someone is preventing them from obtaining a desired object, like a toy.

Analysis: This stimulus describes a behavior that appears aggressive but attributes it to a goal-oriented impulse rather than a desire to cause pain. Toddlers are essentially tiny, blunt instruments of their own desires; they don't bite to be 'evil,' they bite because you're standing between them and a plastic truck. Look for a generalization that suggests an action should be judged by the actor's specific motivation or goal rather than the unpleasantness of the act itself.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

The situation as described above most closely conforms to which one of the following generalizations?

Correct Answer
A
The example directly supports that toddlers sometimes bite as a way to try to solve problems—e.g., to overcome an obstacle to getting a toy—rather than out of malice.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep