ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Computer models suggest that global warming will melt the polar ice, but surprisingly, the total amount of ice will still get bigger.

Reasoning: Models indicate that a small temperature increase would cause significant melting of the polar ice caps, yet the same models predict the total volume of those ice caps would actually increase.

Analysis: The paradox here is the tension between 'melting' and 'increasing volume,' which seems counterintuitive at first glance. To resolve this, we need a piece of information that explains how the ice caps could gain more mass than they lose to melting. For instance, if warmer temperatures lead to significantly increased snowfall in polar regions, the accumulation of new ice could outpace the loss from melting. Look for an answer that provides a mechanism for ice growth that compensates for the heat-induced melting.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to resolve the apparent paradox described above?

Correct Answer
A
A provides the balancing mechanism: increased evaporation leads to more snowfall at the poles, which then accumulates (eventually refreezing), boosting ice volume even as melting occurs where water meets ice. This directly reconciles “melting” with “net volume increase.”
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep