Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because vacations help reduce stress, a manager thinks that breaking your time off into many small trips is the best way to stay refreshed.

Conclusion: To minimize work-related exhaustion, employees should take several short vacations throughout the year instead of one or two long ones.

Reasoning: Every vacation taken by an office worker leads to a significant reduction in psychological exhaustion.

Analysis: The manager's logic is a bit like saying that because every glass of water hydrates you, ten tiny sips are better than one full glass. The flaw lies in the assumption that the frequency of vacations is the only factor that matters, ignoring the potential benefits of the duration of a single long break. Look for an answer that highlights this failure to compare the cumulative effect of many short breaks versus fewer long ones.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

The office manager's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

Correct Answer
E
E pinpoints the missing comparison. The argument assumes short > long in total effect without evidence; if a long vacation reduces exhaustion much more than a short one, then the recommendation to prefer many short breaks may not maximize the reduction.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep