StrengthenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A contest is supposed to be fair, but almost all the winners were people who signed up right at the start. Because of this lopsided result, the whole thing must have been rigged.

Conclusion: The promotional lottery was unfair because it did not give all participants an equal chance of winning.

Reasoning: In a 30-day registration period, 90 percent of the winners were people who submitted their entries within the first 2 days.

Analysis: The argument assumes that the lopsided results (90% of winners from the first 2 days) must be due to a flaw in the lottery itself. However, what if 90% of the *total entries* were submitted in those first two days? If everyone signed up early, then it would be perfectly fair for the winners to be early birds too. To strengthen the argument, we need an answer that suggests the entries were actually spread out over the 30 days, making the winner distribution look much more suspicious.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

Correct Answer
C
If entry forms were submitted at a consistent rate throughout the 30 days, then roughly 2/30 (about 6–7%) of entries came in the first 2 days. Getting 90% of winners from that small subset is extremely disproportionate and strongly supports that entrants did not have equal chances—i.e., the lottery was not fair.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep