StrengthenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: In the 1800s, big houses had skinny floorboards and small houses had wide ones. Since rich people owned the big houses, historians think skinny boards were a way to show off how much money you had.

Conclusion: Narrow floorboards were likely a status symbol used to display wealth in the early nineteenth century.

Reasoning: Historians observed that larger houses, typically owned by wealthier individuals, consistently featured narrower floorboards than smaller houses.

Analysis: To strengthen this argument, we need to find a reason why narrow boards would actually signal wealth. In the world of construction, sometimes the more difficult or labor-intensive option is the one that becomes a status symbol. If narrow boards were more expensive to produce or required more time to install, that would explain why only the rich opted for them. Look for an answer that provides a cost or labor justification for why narrow boards were a luxury choice rather than just a random architectural quirk.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen the historians' argument?

Correct Answer
B
B eliminates the cheapness alternative by saying narrow boards were not significantly less expensive than wide ones. That supports the idea that their use by the wealthy could plausibly function as a status symbol rather than a cost-saving measure.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep