ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: One person blames a moose die-off on parasites from deer. Another person points out that a different area has plenty of deer but the moose there are doing just fine.

Reasoning: Shelton attributes a moose decline to deer-borne parasites, while Russo notes that a nearby region with a similar deer increase has a stable moose population.

Analysis: We have a classic discrepancy between two geographic areas. If deer-borne parasites are the culprit in the first region, why aren't they causing a similar decline in the second? To resolve this, we need a factor that differs between the two regions—perhaps the parasite can't survive in the second region, or the moose there don't interact with the deer in the same way. Look for an answer that provides a meaningful distinction between the two environments or the moose populations themselves.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict between Shelton's and Russo's statements?

Correct Answer
D
Range overlap exists in the declining region but not in the neighboring region. That means moose and deer are near each other (enabling transmission) in the first region, but not in the neighbor, so both statements can be true without contradiction.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep