ParadoxDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: It makes sense that fewer people are getting hurt at work because fewer people are working, but it's weird that the rate of injury is also dropping.
Reasoning: Total injuries falling makes sense if there are fewer workers, but the rate of injury per worker falling requires a different explanation.
Analysis: We need to explain why the likelihood of an individual worker getting hurt has decreased. Four answers will provide a reason for this (e.g., safer conditions, less dangerous jobs being cut first), and the 'EXCEPT' answer will either be irrelevant or make the lower rate even more confusing. Look for an answer that doesn't explain why the workplace became safer on average for the remaining employees.
Reasoning: Total injuries falling makes sense if there are fewer workers, but the rate of injury per worker falling requires a different explanation.
Analysis: We need to explain why the likelihood of an individual worker getting hurt has decreased. Four answers will provide a reason for this (e.g., safer conditions, less dangerous jobs being cut first), and the 'EXCEPT' answer will either be irrelevant or make the lower rate even more confusing. Look for an answer that doesn't explain why the workplace became safer on average for the remaining employees.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage6.Each of the following, if true, helps to explain the surprising result mentioned by the economist EXCEPT:
Correct Answer
D
D does not help explain the lower percentage injured. A general decline in safety resources would be expected to increase injury risk or leave it unchanged, not decrease it.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal