ParadoxDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Oysters in Britain were dying because of a boat chemical called TBT. Even though that chemical has been banned and is mostly gone from the water, the oyster population still isn't bouncing back.

Reasoning: Oyster populations were decimated by the chemical TBT; however, despite the ban and subsequent removal of TBT from the water, the populations have failed to increase.

Analysis: The paradox here is the lack of recovery despite the removal of the primary threat. We need to find a reason why the oysters are still struggling or why the removal of TBT wasn't enough to trigger a comeback. Look for an answer that introduces a new obstacle, such as a different predator moving in, a permanent change in the environment, or a slow reproductive cycle that hasn't had time to show results yet. The correct explanation will bridge the gap between a clean environment and a stagnant population.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the failure of the native oyster populations to recover?

Correct Answer
C
C explains that TBT had also been killing imported oyster varieties that, now that the waters are warmer, flourish at the expense of native oysters. With TBT gone (~~TBT~~) and warmer water favoring the imports, those imports outcompete natives and block their recovery. This neatly resolves why natives didn’t rebound after the ban.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep