Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A columnist thinks car companies are lying about gas mileage because the three cars they've owned didn't live up to the advertised numbers.

Conclusion: Car manufacturers likely exaggerate the fuel economy figures they advertise for their vehicles.

Reasoning: The columnist has owned three cars and was never able to achieve the fuel economy ratings advertised by the manufacturers for those specific makes.

Analysis: The columnist is guilty of a classic hasty generalization. They are drawing a broad conclusion about an entire industry based on a tiny, anecdotal sample size of just three cars. It’s a bit like saying all restaurants are terrible because you had three bad meals in one city. Look for an answer that points out the sample is too small or that the columnist's personal driving habits might be the real reason for the discrepancy.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

The reasoning in the columnist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Correct Answer
A
It generalizes from the columnist’s experience with only three cars to a broad conclusion about manufacturers’ advertising, which is a sample-size flaw.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep