Role in ArgumentDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The mayor compares traffic jams to the long lines on free ice cream day, concluding that charging for road use will stop people from overusing them.

Conclusion: Implementing a fee for road use during rush hour will successfully reduce traffic congestion.

Reasoning: Valuable things that are free, like roads or promotional ice cream, inevitably lead to overconsumption and long waits.

Analysis: The specific claim about 'overconsumption and long lines' serves as a general principle derived from a specific example (the ice cream promotion). This principle is then used to explain the underlying cause of the current problem (traffic) and to justify the proposed solution (charging money). In LSAT terms, this is a bridge that connects a real-world observation to a policy recommendation. It functions as a premise that provides a theoretical basis for the mayor's plan.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The claim that when something valuable costs no money you get overconsumption and long lines plays which one of the following roles in the mayor's argument?

Correct Answer
D
D is correct because the quoted line is a general principle offered as evidence that supports the overall conclusion (institute rush-hour road pricing so congestion will abate).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep