Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Banks are lending less to small businesses, won't touch risky companies, and aren't making money off the safe ones, so overall lending must be lower than it used to be.

Conclusion: Total bank lending to all companies has decreased compared to five years ago.

Reasoning: Lending to small and medium companies is down, banks refuse to lend to weak companies, and lending to strong companies is currently unprofitable for banks.

Analysis: The economist shows that lending to small/medium companies is down, but the evidence regarding large, strong companies is only about current profitability, not the actual volume of loans. To make the conclusion follow logically, we need to bridge the gap between 'unprofitable' and 'lower volume than five years ago.' Look for an assumption that guarantees that because these loans are currently a bad deal for banks, the total amount of money lent to these large companies is less than it was in the past.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

The economist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Correct Answer
A
If banks will not lend at rates lower than their borrowing rates, then given that their borrowing rate exceeds the rate they can get from large, strong companies, banks will make no such loans now. Since lending to small/medium companies is lower than five years ago, total lending now must be lower than five years ago.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep