Passage Summary: A doctor thinks the government gave up on a new fat tax too quickly, even though people were crossing borders to avoid it.

Conclusion: The decision to repeal the tax on saturated fat was premature.

Reasoning: Although the tax led to some negative side effects like people traveling to buy food elsewhere, it was only in effect for seven months.

Analysis: The physician acknowledges the 'undesirable consequences' but insists on keeping the tax anyway. To justify this, we need a principle that favors long-term health goals or policy stability over short-term hiccups. Look for an answer that suggests a policy should be given more time to work or that unintended consequences aren't enough on their own to justify an immediate repeal.