Passage Summary: Even though Ted is a bit of a slacker who makes his coworkers pick up the slack, his boss decides to keep him because his rare skills are too valuable to lose.

Conclusion: Tatiana should not request that Ted be replaced despite his performance issues.

Reasoning: Ted provides unique and irreplaceable contributions to the workplace that outweigh the fact that he works short hours and increases the workload for his colleagues.

Analysis: This is a 'Principle' question where we need to find a rule that bridges the gap between Ted's annoying behavior and Tatiana's decision to keep him. The argument acknowledges a significant downside—the burden on other employees—but decides the upside of 'irreplaceable contributions' is more important. We need a principle that explicitly prioritizes the value of unique, high-level output over standard expectations of fairness and hours worked. Look for a rule that justifies keeping an employee based on their net value to the organization rather than their adherence to typical performance standards.