Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Enrique thinks the city transit should keep spending money until it's broke because the government will eventually step in to save it. Cynthia thinks the government will just let them go bankrupt and says they shouldn't take that chance.

Reasoning: Enrique believes the federal government will provide a bailout once funds are gone, whereas Cynthia believes the government will allow the authority to fail.

Analysis: We need to find the specific point where one person says 'yes' and the other says 'no.' Enrique is confident that the federal government will provide funding as a last resort, while Cynthia explicitly states the government will 'probably just let the authority go out of business.' The disagreement centers on the predicted behavior of the federal government in response to the transit authority running out of money.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

The dialogue most strongly supports the claim that Enrique and Cynthia disagree over whether

Correct Answer
A
Enrique explicitly says the authority should continue operating without cuts or fare increases until funds are exhausted; Cynthia says the authority cannot risk that plan because the bailout likely won’t arrive. They directly disagree on whether to pursue that strategy.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep