PrincipleDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Making a situation seem safer can actually backfire because it encourages people to act more recklessly, which can worsen the original problem.

Conclusion: Technical fixes for global warming might inadvertently lead to more global warming by encouraging higher carbon emissions.

Reasoning: Just as wide, safe-looking roads encourage drivers to take more risks, a 'fix' for global warming might make people feel safe enough to emit more CO2.

Analysis: The engineer is using an analogy to illustrate a broader principle of human behavior. The core idea is that when you mitigate the perceived danger of an activity, people tend to engage in that activity more frequently or intensely. To identify the principle, look for a statement that links the reduction of a risk with an increase in the behavior that creates that risk. It’s the 'safety net' irony: the more protected people feel, the more likely they are to walk closer to the edge.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

The engineer's argument can most reasonably be interpreted as invoking which one of the following principles?

Correct Answer
A
A states the risk-compensation principle the engineer relies on: conditions that create a feeling of security also encourage risk taking. That matches both the road example and the climate fix prediction.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep