Flawed ReasoningDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since there's already more art than we can handle, new artists are wrong to think they are adding any extra value to our lives.

Conclusion: Contemporary artists are wrong to believe that their work provides people with a level of aesthetic fulfillment they wouldn't otherwise experience.

Reasoning: There is already a surplus of great art in the world—more than anyone could finish in a lifetime—covering every possible taste.

Analysis: This argument assumes that because 'enough' art exists, new art cannot provide additional or unique fulfillment. It's like saying because there are already enough delicious recipes to last a lifetime, a new chef can't possibly make you happier with a new dish. The flaw lies in the assumption that the sheer quantity of existing art renders new contributions redundant. Look for an answer that points out that 'more than enough' doesn't mean 'no more room for improvement or variety.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

16.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Correct Answer
D
D is correct because it highlights an overlooked scenario: many people may have severely restricted access to most existing great artworks, and a contemporary artist’s work could reach them, enabling greater aesthetic fulfillment than otherwise possible. That directly undercuts the conclusion that contemporary artists are mistaken.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep