Role in ArgumentDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bird experts argue that planting more trees hasn't saved songbirds because the real issue is that the forests are being broken into small pieces, making it easier for predators to find nests.

Conclusion: Forest fragmentation is the primary threat to songbirds, rather than just the total size of the forest.

Reasoning: Reforestation hasn't helped because the new or existing forests are broken up, which lets predators get to the nests more easily.

Analysis: The claim about recent reforestation serves as a background fact that the ornithologists use to pivot to their main point. It acknowledges a potentially positive trend (more trees) only to show that this trend isn't solving the underlying problem of fragmentation. By showing that birds are still struggling even when trees are added, the author strengthens the claim that the shape of the forest matters more than the total amount of forest.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

The claim that there has recently been reforestation plays which one of the following roles in the ornithologists' argument?

Correct Answer
C
C is correct because the claim of recent reforestation is used as a concession that could seem to help songbirds, yet the argument says the threat is worsening anyway. It’s presented as compatible with the worsening trend once we recognize fragmentation—not total forest size—is the key danger.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep