Passage Summary: Scientists believe two things that, when put together, prove a third thing is false; therefore, the scientists must believe that third thing is false.

Conclusion: Most scientists in the survey do not believe the Minsk Hypothesis is true.

Reasoning: The scientists accept Wang's Law and the Brown-Eisler results, which together logically disprove the Minsk Hypothesis.

Analysis: This argument assumes that the scientists are logically consistent and have actually connected the dots between what they know and what it implies. In the world of the LSAT, just because someone knows 'A' and knows 'A implies B,' you cannot assume they have concluded 'B' unless the argument explicitly states they've made that connection. The 'Gap' here is the scientists' awareness of the contradiction. Look for an answer that bridges the gap by stating the scientists actually recognize that their beliefs are incompatible with the Minsk Hypothesis.