Must be FalseDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Over 120 years, Britain's economy grew five times larger, but the average person's carbon footprint stayed exactly the same.

Reasoning: Between 1880 and 2000, Britain's economy expanded by 500%, yet the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person remained identical at both the start and end of that period.

Analysis: We are looking for a statement that is impossible given these facts. The data shows that economic growth can occur (and quite significantly) without an increase in per capita CO2 emissions. Therefore, any generalization claiming that economic growth *must* lead to higher per capita emissions, or that the two are strictly tied together, would be 'incompatible' with this evidence. When evaluating the options, look for a rigid rule that the historical data from Britain has already broken.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

The claims made above are incompatible with which one of the following generalizations?

Correct Answer
E
E claims that economic growth inevitably increases per capita CO2 emissions. Britain’s case—fivefold economic growth with no increase in per capita emissions—directly contradicts that inevitability, so E is incompatible.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep