Must be FalseDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Crows sleep in one spot and fly very far away to find food, but when they pick a new place to sleep, they stay very close to their old neighborhood.

Reasoning: Crows hunt in a massive radius (up to 130km) from their roosts, yet when they move their roosting site, they typically move it less than 8km away.

Analysis: Since this is a 'Must be False' style question, we need to find a claim that contradicts the provided geographic rules. The most vulnerable point is the massive discrepancy between the hunting range (130km) and the relocation distance (8km). Any claim suggesting that a flock moves its roost specifically to reach a completely new, non-overlapping hunting territory would likely be false, as an 8km move is a drop in the bucket compared to a 130km hunting radius. Focus on statements that ignore these specific distance constraints.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

26.

Of the following claims, which one can most justifiably be rejected on the basis of the statements above?

Correct Answer
E
E claims that when a flock moves roosts, it generally does so because its hunting area has been depleted. But flocks can forage up to 100–130 km from a roost, and when they move roosts they usually shift less than 8 km—too small a change to solve a broad depletion problem. Plus, they normally occupy the same roost for years, which also counters the idea of frequent moves due to depletion. So E is justifiably rejected by the given facts.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep