Flawed ReasoningDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Critics used a bad survey to say a movie is harmful, so the critics must be wrong and the movie isn't harmful at all.

Conclusion: The critics' assertion that the movie will cause irresponsible behavior is definitely false.

Reasoning: The survey data the critics used to support their claim was found to be deeply flawed.

Analysis: This is a 'failure of proof' flaw, where the author assumes that because a claim hasn't been proven true, it must therefore be false. Just because the critics' evidence (the survey) is bad doesn't mean their conclusion (the movie is harmful) is actually incorrect. Look for an answer that describes this error of confusing a lack of evidence for the claim with evidence against the claim.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

The argument is flawed in that it

Correct Answer
A
A is correct. Showing that the only evidence is deeply flawed undermines support for the critics’ claim, but it doesn’t establish that the claim is false. The argument leaps from “unsupported” to “untrue.”
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep